USTREAM.TV is in their sixth year, having started from an idea to communicate with family members overseas. Kris Cantu, who appeared on PrisonPlanet.TV Nightly News broadcast with InfoWars.com host David Knight, talked about the power of UStream.TV and made a point to mention that;
“UStream.TV is not tied to any mainstream media, or Google or YouTube. We’re a kind of stand-alone entity that allows a broadcaster to go LIVE in a number of ways, whether mobile phone, desktop or professional high-end encoding – to go LIVE, and to capture as many viewers as possible to see your content. “
The upcoming Bilderberg Conference in England is scheduled to be at the Grove Hotel Watford, from the 6th to the 9th of June, 2013. The 2013 Bilderberg Group Conference will be broadcast LIVE by people covering the conference and using UStream.TV.
The power of UStream.TV is evidenced by two (2) million viewers that listened to the Police Scanner Feed that was broadcast LIVE during the April 15, 2013 Boston Marathon Bombing.
UStream.TV has Free and Pay Services, but even with the Free Service there is an APP for IOS and Android that allows you to stream LIVE video to the internet. One feature that is unlike any other service currently available is Social Stream, which can be embedded along with the UStream.TV viewer, and allows viewers to chat in real time, which is integrated with Facebook and Twitter accounts.
On their About Page is a description of UStream.TV which reads;
As the world’s fastest-growing and largest live streaming platform with over 50 million unique monthly viewers and a network of produced and user-generated content, Ustream is fundamentally reshaping online media. Our mission is to bring the world together by immersing viewers in live broadcasts that create riveting experiences, interactive communities, and lasting connections. The innovative products and powerful technologies we create will change the world.
Ustream’s turnkey PPV platform allows you to start monetizing your live events instantly. Connect your PayPal account, set your ticket price, schedule your event and within minutes you can start selling tickets and streaming live to an audience of unlimited size. No up-front set-up fee and no restrictions. Watch our tutorial on setting up your own PPV event.
Keep previously produced or recorded video working for you and reaching audiences around the clock, long after your live transmission has ended. Our latest innovation, Live Playlists, enables broadcasters to easily schedule sequences of video which can run “as live” at specific times, or as continuous loops — giving viewers an experience similar to that of broadcast television. You can also create highlights of extraordinary moments from your live broadcasts and syndicate to other video viewing platforms to increase message reach and virality. Try it FreeSignup and Pricing
Source:
Are You The Next Alex Jones or Paul Revere? Published on May 22, 2013 As international scrutiny of Bilderberg increases, InfoWars talks with Kris Cantu at Ustream about our plans for live coverage from London and integration with social media. Kris talks about how you can use live news casts to cover breaking stories or protect your video from confiscation.
New Media vs. Old Media: Which Side Did You Partake In Yesterday’s Play-By-Play in Boston? Posted on April 20, 2013 by Brad Hunstable, CEO and Founder Yesterday, we at Ustream — along with millions across the globe — were taken in by the events that quickly unfolded as the second suspect of the Boston Marathon was captured. Last night, we saw heightened engagement from a scanner that surfaced on Ustream (http://www.ustream.tv/channel/ma-rt-9-window-cam), which enabled nearly 2.5 million people to share this live experience. At its peak around 8:15/8:30pm Eastern, over 265k viewers were watching/listening concurrently. Even more eye-opening was that nearly half the viewers were tuning in via mobile devices.
Disclaimer:
The views expressed in Intellihub.com articles are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Intellihub.com. Intellihub.com will not be held responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in Intellihub.com articles. Intellihub.com reserves the right to remove articles from the website.
National Treasury Employees Union, Colleen Kelley, visited the White House at 12:30 p.m. March 31, 2010
WASHINGTON, DC – MAY 21: Former IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman is sworn in prior to testifying before the Senate Finance Committee May 21, 2013 in Washington, DC. The committee heard testimony on the topic of on ‘A Review of Criteria Used by the IRS to Identify 501(c)(4) Applications for Greater Scrutiny.’ (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
According to the White House Visitors Log, provided here in searchable form by U.S. News and World Report, the president of the anti-Tea Party National Treasury Employees Union, Colleen Kelley, visited the White House at 12:30 p.m. that Wednesday noon time of March 31st. The White House lists the IRS union leader’s visit this way:
‘Kelley, Colleen POTUS 03/31/2010 12:30′
In White House language, ‘POTUS’ stands for ‘President of the United States.’ The very next day after her White House meeting with the President, according to the Treasury Department’s Inspector General’s Report, IRS employees — the same employees who belong to the NTEU — set to work in earnest targeting the Tea Party and conservative groups around America.
The IG report wrote it up this way:
‘April 1-2, 2010: The new Acting Manager, Technical Unit, suggested the need for a Sensitive Case Report on the Tea Party cases. The Determinations Unit Program Manager Agreed.’
In short: the very day after the president of the quite publicly anti-Tea Party labor union — the union for IRS employees — met with President Obama, the manager of the IRS ‘Determinations Unit Program agreed’ to open a ‘Sensitive Case report on the Tea party cases.’ As stated by the IG report.
Lerner announced her plans to plead the Fifth during her testimony in a letter from her lawyer, William Taylor III, to the committee. “She has not committed any crime or made any misrepresentation but under the circumstances she has no choice but to take this course,” the letter addressed to Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) reads, according to the Los Angeles Times.
Since she will be pleading the Fifth, Taylor has asked the committee that she be excused from testifying. The letter from Taylor states that her testimony would “have no purpose other than to embarrass or burden her.”
One has to wonder if the IRS actions to target Tea Party Groups was at the direction of the President. The article by Jeffrey Lord of American Spectator is particularly damning and includes critical information from various sources that ties everything together.
In other words, the IRS union chief went to the White House to meet personally with the president on March 31. The union already had Executive Order 13522 behind it, issued by the President barely three months earlier. An Executive Order directing that the IRS must “allow employees and unions to have pre-decisional involvement in all workplace matters….”.
The very next day after that March 31 meeting at the White House, the IRS, with the union involved in its decision-making, was setting up its “Sensitive Case Report on the Tea Party.”
Which raises the famous question from Watergate: What did the President know and when did he know it?
According to U.S. Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, Douglas Shulman was the acting commissioner of the IRS during the time when non-profit 501(c)(4) groups, specifically conservative and republican leaning groups, were “improperly” targeted for increased scrutiny according to the name of the non-profit organization and according to the political positions of the organization.[9] In a congressional hearing held on May 21st, 2013,
Douglas Shulman denied responsibility for the policy, stating that he found out about the use of inappropriate criteria from Steven T. Miller.
Disclaimer:
The views expressed in Intellihub.com articles are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Intellihub.com. Intellihub.com will not be held responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in Intellihub.com articles. Intellihub.com reserves the right to remove articles from the website.
Is the Nova PBS Premier of “Manhunt – Boston Bombers” similar to “Debunking 9/11 Bomb Theories”
Special Report
WASHINGTON, DC – MAY 15: (AFP OUT) (L-R) U.S. President Barack Obama, Attorney General Eric Holder and Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano look on during the 32nd annual National Peace Officers’ Memorial Service at the West Front Lawn at the U.S. Capitol May 15, 2013 in Washington, DC. President Barack Obama delivered remarks at the event, invoking the law enforcement officers who worked to bring the Boston Marathon bombing suspects to justice. (Photo by Olivier Douliery – Pool/Getty Images)
The Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) is a non-profit public broadcasting television network in the United States, with 354 member television stations which hold collective ownership.[2] Its headquarters is in Arlington, Virginia. PBS is the most prominent provider of television programs to U.S. public television stations, distributing series such as Sesame Street, PBS NewsHour,Masterpiece, and Frontline.
What better way create the Official State Narrative to literally millions of Americans? One recalls the famous quote by Winston Churchill: “History is written by the victors.” This phenomenon, which is the re-writing and promotion of historical events, is termed the politics of memory, which according to Wikipedia:
The politics of memory is the political means by which events are remembered and recorded, or discarded. The terminology addresses the role of politics in shaping collective memory and how remembrances can differ markedly from the objective truth of the events as they happened. The influence of politics on memory is seen in the way history is written and passed on. Source:politics of memory
Clearly, the rationale for this form of Political censorship occurs when governments hold back information from their citizens. This is often done to exert control over the populace and prevent free expression that might foment rebellion. Source: Censorship
In an article posted by The Washington Times on Friday, May 4, 2007 titled PBS: Back to bias basics, a familiar story emerges in that the Public Broadcasting Service is essentially a state propaganda arm of the Obama Administration.
A few years ago, the left pulled several muscles exerting the strange theory that the Public Broadcasting Service was lurching dangerously to the right. When Corporation for Public Broadcasting Chairman Kenneth Tomlinson had the audacity not only to speak internal profanities (“fairness” and “balance”), but to try to build on them, it became clear to them he was out of control and had to be stopped.
[…]
The left maintains an iron grip on PBS with all the maturity and sophistication that a 4-year-old hangs on to a Happy Meal toy. The motto of its campaign against Mr. Tomlinson’s alleged transgressions should have been: “Mine. Mine. All Mine.”
Mr. Tomlinson is long gone, and Democrats now control Congress. But another step was necessary for classic PBS propaganda to re-emerge: the return of Bill Moyers. He was back to full-time fulminating duties April 25, with a special titled “Buying the War.” The entire thesis of this 90-minute taxpayer-funded lecture? The national media were willing cogs in the neoconservative machine that took America to war.
How is this for PBS balance: Mr. Moyers didn’t allow a single conservative, neo- or otherwise, to challenge this ludicrous idea. Oh, there were assorted clips of conservatives (myself included) speaking in the months after September 11, 2001, but only to “prove” his case for a noxious “patriotism police” that allowed no dissent.
[…]
In the same week, defense expert Frank Gaffney was telling a far different story — in fact, the opposite story. Unlike Mr. Moyers, Mr. Gaffney had proof. Back in the Tomlinson era, CPB pursued the idea of a broad-based documentary series on how America would respond to the post-September 11 world. Mr. Gaffney’s documentary proposal on “Islam vs. Islamism,” focusing on moderate Muslims’ efforts to challenge Islamofascists, was given a green light as one installment in the 11-part series called “America at the Crossroads.”
In a Bill Moyers Journal review of Buying the War on PBS.org, he quotes Walter Pincus of The Washington Post, who painfully admits to this very kind of State Sponsored Propaganda.
“Buying the War” examines the press coverage in the lead-up to the war as evidence of a paradigm shift in the role of journalists in democracy and asks, four years after the invasion, what’s changed? “More and more the media become, I think, common carriers of administration statements and critics of the administration,” says THE WASHINGTON POST’s Walter Pincus. “We’ve sort of given up being independent on our own.” – Source PBS.org Buying the War
One look at the list of sponsors and funding and the picture becomes clear. PBS has been a mechanism of creating the historical record – regardless of the actual facts or controversy that millions of informed people are aware of. One infamous documentary series that involved re-writing history is:
Debunking 9/11 Bomb Theories Posted 09.05.06 NOVA Dr. Shyam Sunder, lead investigator for the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the government body tasked with investigating the Twin Towers’ collapse, explains away various conspiracy theories regarding the collapse. In this frank talk with NOVA producer Larry Klein, Sunder discusses why the buildings collapsed in an apparent free fall, why molten metal was seen high on one tower, and what puffs of smoke seen lower in the buildings actually were.
NOTE:
Intellihub.com is preparing a follow-up article that will publish all evidence to date on the Boston Marathon Bombing, While that is in production, please pass this information to as many people as possible so that the Truth on the Boston Marathon Bombing will be fully documented by all researchers who respect the Truth.
Manhunt – Boston Bombers | NOVA http://www.youtube.com/user/NOVAonline Published on May 20, 2013 – 5 views May 20, 2013 @ 1:00pm Premieres Wednesday, May 29th at 9PM/8c (check local listings) www.pbs.org/nova/manhunt At 2:50 pm on April 15, two bomb blasts turned the Boston Marathon finish line from a scene of triumph to tragedy, leaving three dead, hundreds injured, and a city gripped by heartbreak and terror. Less than five days later, the key suspects were identified. Soon one was dead, the other in custody. How did investigators transform the chaos of the bombing into a coherent trail of clues, pointing to the accused killers? NOVA follows the manhunt step by step, examining the role modern technology—combined with old-fashioned detective work—played in cracking the case. Given hundreds of hours of surveillance and bystander videos, how did agents spot the suspects in a sea of spectators? Why couldn’t facial recognition software I.D. the criminals? How much could bomb chemistry analysis, cell phone GPS, infrared imagery and crowd sourcing reveal about the secrets behind this horrific crime? With the help of top criminal investigators and anti-terrorism experts, NOVA explores which technological innovations worked — and which didn’t — in the most notorious case of today, and how the world of crime fighting could be transformed tomorrow.
The views expressed in Intellihub.com articles are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Intellihub.com. Intellihub.com will not be held responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in Intellihub.com articles. Intellihub.com reserves the right to remove articles from the website.
An FBI Investigation is underway into the May 14th, 2013 Quabbin Reservoir Trespassing by Foreign Chemical Engineer Graduates
WASHINGTON, DC – JANUARY 31: (L-R) FBI Director Robert Mueller, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and CIA Director David Petraeus appear before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence on Capitol Hill January 31, 2012 in Washington, DC. The committee met to hear testimony on the topic of ‘World Wide Threats.’ (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Early in the morning hours on Tuesday, May 14th, 2013, Massachusetts State Police discovered 7 individuals trespassing at the Quabbin Reservoir in Massachusetts. The Quabbin Reservoir supplies 40% of Massachusetts fresh drinking water and encompasses 39 square miles in size.
BELCHERTOWN (CBS) – Shortly after midnight Tuesday, seven people were caught trespassing at the Quabbin Reservoir. State Police say the five men and two women are from Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Singapore, and “cited their education and career interests” for being in the area. The men told police they were chemical engineers and recent college graduates.
The Quabbin, in Belchertown, is one of the country’s largest man-made public water supplies. Boston’s drinking water comes from the Quabbin and the Wachusett Reservoirs. State Police say there were no warrants or advisories on any of the individuals and “there was no evidence that the seven were committing any crime beyond the trespassing.”
All seven were allowed to leave and will be summonsed to court for trespassing. The FBI is investigating and routine checks of public water supplies have been increased following the incident. The seven individuals currently live in Amherst, Cambridge, Sunderland, Northampton and New York City. Police have not released their names because a court date has not been set.
Published on May 15, 2013 — 126 views 05-20-2013 @ 9:35am Police across the state of Massachusetts are increasing the number of routine checks of the state’s water supply facilities after a case of trespassing at Quabbin Reservoir.
Published on May 16, 2013 — 130 views 05-20-2013 @ 10:00am Police across the state of Massachusetts are increasing the number of routine checks of the state’s water supply facilities after a case of trespassing at Quabbin Reservoir.
The views expressed in Intellihub.com articles are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Intellihub.com. Intellihub.com will not be held responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in Intellihub.com articles. Intellihub.com reserves the right to remove articles from the website.
Sheriffs & Citizens join together to bring this action in defense of the Second and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States
WASHINGTON, DC – FEBRUARY 25: Governor John Hickenlooper of Colorado speaks to the media after a meeting with President Barack Obama at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building February 25, 2011 in Washington, DC. Obama met with Democratic governors to discuss the ways Washington and the states can work together to create jobs and benefit the economy. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Dave Kopel is Research Director of the Independence Institute; an Associate Policy Analyst with the Cato Institute, in Washington; and adjunct Professor of Advanced Constitutional Law at the Universtiy of Denver’s Sturm College of Law. His website is www.davekopel.org. He is a regular panelist on Colorado Public Television’s “Colorado Inside Out”, and a blogger on the Volokh Conspiracy (the world’s leading law eblog).
Published on May 17, 2013 — 16,935 views 05/19/2013 @ 5:00pm
The Independence Institute held a press conference on May 17, 2013 announcing the lawsuit against the new anti-gun bills passed by the Colorado legislature and signed by Governor John Hickenlooper. The lead attorney is Dave Kopel.
1. On March 20, 2013, Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper signed two measures that severely restrict citizens’ rights to own, use, manufacture, sell, or transfer firearms and firearms accessories.
2. HB 12242. House Bill 13 – 1224 (“HB 1224”) bans outright all ammunition magazines sold or acquired after July 1, 2013 that hold more than 15 rounds of ammunition. HB 1224 also bans most other magazines of any size because it prohibits smaller magazines that are “designed to be readily converted” to hold more than 15 rounds of ammunition.
54 SHERIFFS:
JOHN B. COOKE, Sheriff of Weld County, Colorado;
TERRY MAKETA, Sheriff of El Paso County, Colorado;
JUSTIN SMITH, Sheriff of Larimer County, Colorado;
DAVID A. WEAVER, Sheriff of Douglas County, Colorado;
BRUCE W. HARTMAN, Sheriff of Gilpin County, Colorado;
KEN PUTNAM, Sheriff of Cheyenne County, Colorado;
DENNIS SPRUELL, Sheriff of Montezuma County, Colorado;
TIM JANTZ, Sheriff of Moffat County, Colorado;
JERRY MARTIN, Sheriff of Dolores County, Colorado;
MIKE ENSMINGER, Sheriff of Teller County, Colorado;
SHAYNE HEAP, Sheriff of Elbert County, Colorado;
CHAD DAY, Sheriff of Yuma County, Colorado;
FRED D. MCKEE, Sheriff of Delta County, Colorado;
LOU VALLARIO, Sheriff of Garfield County, Colorado;
FRED HOSSELKUS, Sheriff of Mineral County, Colorado;
BRETT L. POWELL, Sheriff of Logan County, Colorado;
JAMES FAULL, Sheriff of Prowers County, Colorado;
LARRY KUNTZ, Sheriff of Washington County, Colorado;
BRIAN E. NORTON, Sheriff of Rio Grande County, Colorado;
DUKE SCHIRARD, Sheriff of La Plata County, Colorado;
JIM BEICKER, Sheriff of Fremont County, Colorado;
RONALD BRUCE, Sheriff of Hinsdale County, Colorado;
CHRIS S. JOHNSON, Sheriff of Otero County, Colorado;
FRED JOBE, Sheriff of Custer County, Colorado;
DONALD KRUEGER, Sheriff of Clear Creek County, Colorado;
JAMES CRONE, Sheriff of Morgan County, Colorado;
SI WOODRUFF, Sheriff of Rio Blanco County, Colorado;
TOM RIDNOUR, Sheriff of Kit Carson County, Colorado;
TOM NESTOR, Sheriff of Lincoln County, Colorado;
STAN HILKEY, Sheriff of Mesa County, Colorado;
FORREST FRAZEE, Sheriff of Kiowa County, Colorado;
RICK DUNLAP, Sheriff of Montrose County, Colorado;
TED B. MINK, Sheriff of Jefferson County, Colorado;
DAVE STONG, Sheriff of Alamosa County, Colorado;
FRED WEGENER, Sheriff of Park County, Colorado;
BRUCE NEWMAN, Sheriff of HuerfanoCounty, Colorado;
RANDY PECK, Sheriff of Sedgwick County, Colorado;
DOMINIC MATTIVI, JR., Sheriff of Ouray County, Colorado;
JOHN MINOR, Sheriff of Summit County, Colorado;
SCOTT FISCHER, Sheriff of Jackson County, Colorado;
PETER GONZALEZ, Sheriff of Archuleta County, Colorado;
RICK BESECKER, Sheriff of Gunnison County, Colorado;
CHARLES “ROB”URBACH, Sheriff of Phillips County, Colorado;
ROD FENSKE, Sheriff of Lake County, Colorado;
GRAYSON ROBINSON, Sheriff of Arapahoe County, Colorado;
DAVIDD. CAMPBELL, Sheriff of Baca County, Colorado;
MIKE NORRIS, Sheriff of Saguache County, Colorado;
AMOS MEDINA, Sheriff of Costilla County, Colorado;
MILES CLARK, Sheriff of Crowley County, Colorado;
DAVID ENCINIAS, Sheriff of Bent County, Colorado;
SUE KURTZ, Sheriff of San Juan County, Colorado;
JAMES (JIM) CASIAS, Sheriff of Las Animas County, Colorado;
GARRETT WIGGINS, Sheriff of Routt County, Colorado;
DOUGLAS N. DARR, Sheriff of Adams County, Colorado;
COLORADO OUTFITTERS ASSOCIATION;
COLORADO FARM BUREAU;
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION;
MAGPUL INDUSTRIES;
USA LIBERTY ARMS;
OUTDOOR BUDDIES, INC.;
WOMEN FOR CONCEALED CARRY;
COLORADO STATE SHOOTING ASSOCIATION;
HAMILTON FAMILY ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a FAMILY SHOOTING CENTER AT CHERRY CREEK STATE PARK;
DAVID STRUMILLO;
DAVID BAYNE;
DYLAN HARRELL;
ROCKY MOUNTAIN SHOOTERS SUPPLY;
2ND AMENDMENT GUNSMITH & SHOOTER SUPPLY,LLC;
BURRUD ARMS INC. D/B/A JENSEN ARMS;
GREEN MOUNTAIN GUNS;
JERRY’S OUTDOOR SPORTS;
GRAND PRIX GUNS;
SPECIALTY SPORTS & SUPPLY;
GOODS FOR THE WOODS;
John Hickenlooper, a self-described “recovering geologist now on loan to public service,” was elected Governor in 2010. His unconventional road to the Capitol began when he left the oilfields of western Colorado in the late 1980s and opened the state’s first brewpub. As he says, “I went from exploring oil to selling beer.” His business grew, helping to revitalize a now popular neighborhood in downtown Denver, and he became active in Denver’s civic life. One thing led to another, until, goaded by friends and other business leaders, he successfully ran for Mayor of Denver in 2003.
This case will consider a century-old precedent concerning the scope of the Privileges and Immunities and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. If the Court sides with Petitioners Otis McDonald, et al., it may reverse the Slaughterhouse line of cases and incorporate the Second Amendment—and possibly the entire Bill of Rights—against the States. On the other hand, if the Court sides with Respondent, City of Chicago, et al., it will uphold the Slaughterhouse cases and restrict the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The views expressed in Intellihub.com articles are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Intellihub.com. Intellihub.com will not be held responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in Intellihub.com articles. Intellihub.com reserves the right to remove articles from the website.
Sheriffs & Citizens join together to bring this action in defense of the Second and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States
WASHINGTON, DC – FEBRUARY 25: Governor John Hickenlooper of Colorado speaks to the media after a meeting with President Barack Obama at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building February 25, 2011 in Washington, DC. Obama met with Democratic governors to discuss the ways Washington and the states can work together to create jobs and benefit the economy. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Dave Kopel is Research Director of the Independence Institute; an Associate Policy Analyst with the Cato Institute, in Washington; and adjunct Professor of Advanced Constitutional Law at the Universtiy of Denver’s Sturm College of Law. His website is www.davekopel.org. He is a regular panelist on Colorado Public Television’s “Colorado Inside Out”, and a blogger on the Volokh Conspiracy (the world’s leading law eblog).
Published on May 17, 2013 — 16,935 views 05/19/2013 @ 5:00pm
The Independence Institute held a press conference on May 17, 2013 announcing the lawsuit against the new anti-gun bills passed by the Colorado legislature and signed by Governor John Hickenlooper. The lead attorney is Dave Kopel.
1. On March 20, 2013, Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper signed two measures that severely restrict citizens’ rights to own, use, manufacture, sell, or transfer firearms and firearms accessories.
2. HB 12242. House Bill 13 – 1224 (“HB 1224”) bans outright all ammunition magazines sold or acquired after July 1, 2013 that hold more than 15 rounds of ammunition. HB 1224 also bans most other magazines of any size because it prohibits smaller magazines that are “designed to be readily converted” to hold more than 15 rounds of ammunition.
54 SHERIFFS:
JOHN B. COOKE, Sheriff of Weld County, Colorado;
TERRY MAKETA, Sheriff of El Paso County, Colorado;
JUSTIN SMITH, Sheriff of Larimer County, Colorado;
DAVID A. WEAVER, Sheriff of Douglas County, Colorado;
BRUCE W. HARTMAN, Sheriff of Gilpin County, Colorado;
KEN PUTNAM, Sheriff of Cheyenne County, Colorado;
DENNIS SPRUELL, Sheriff of Montezuma County, Colorado;
TIM JANTZ, Sheriff of Moffat County, Colorado;
JERRY MARTIN, Sheriff of Dolores County, Colorado;
MIKE ENSMINGER, Sheriff of Teller County, Colorado;
SHAYNE HEAP, Sheriff of Elbert County, Colorado;
CHAD DAY, Sheriff of Yuma County, Colorado;
FRED D. MCKEE, Sheriff of Delta County, Colorado;
LOU VALLARIO, Sheriff of Garfield County, Colorado;
FRED HOSSELKUS, Sheriff of Mineral County, Colorado;
BRETT L. POWELL, Sheriff of Logan County, Colorado;
JAMES FAULL, Sheriff of Prowers County, Colorado;
LARRY KUNTZ, Sheriff of Washington County, Colorado;
BRIAN E. NORTON, Sheriff of Rio Grande County, Colorado;
DUKE SCHIRARD, Sheriff of La Plata County, Colorado;
JIM BEICKER, Sheriff of Fremont County, Colorado;
RONALD BRUCE, Sheriff of Hinsdale County, Colorado;
CHRIS S. JOHNSON, Sheriff of Otero County, Colorado;
FRED JOBE, Sheriff of Custer County, Colorado;
DONALD KRUEGER, Sheriff of Clear Creek County, Colorado;
JAMES CRONE, Sheriff of Morgan County, Colorado;
SI WOODRUFF, Sheriff of Rio Blanco County, Colorado;
TOM RIDNOUR, Sheriff of Kit Carson County, Colorado;
TOM NESTOR, Sheriff of Lincoln County, Colorado;
STAN HILKEY, Sheriff of Mesa County, Colorado;
FORREST FRAZEE, Sheriff of Kiowa County, Colorado;
RICK DUNLAP, Sheriff of Montrose County, Colorado;
TED B. MINK, Sheriff of Jefferson County, Colorado;
DAVE STONG, Sheriff of Alamosa County, Colorado;
FRED WEGENER, Sheriff of Park County, Colorado;
BRUCE NEWMAN, Sheriff of HuerfanoCounty, Colorado;
RANDY PECK, Sheriff of Sedgwick County, Colorado;
DOMINIC MATTIVI, JR., Sheriff of Ouray County, Colorado;
JOHN MINOR, Sheriff of Summit County, Colorado;
SCOTT FISCHER, Sheriff of Jackson County, Colorado;
PETER GONZALEZ, Sheriff of Archuleta County, Colorado;
RICK BESECKER, Sheriff of Gunnison County, Colorado;
CHARLES “ROB”URBACH, Sheriff of Phillips County, Colorado;
ROD FENSKE, Sheriff of Lake County, Colorado;
GRAYSON ROBINSON, Sheriff of Arapahoe County, Colorado;
DAVIDD. CAMPBELL, Sheriff of Baca County, Colorado;
MIKE NORRIS, Sheriff of Saguache County, Colorado;
AMOS MEDINA, Sheriff of Costilla County, Colorado;
MILES CLARK, Sheriff of Crowley County, Colorado;
DAVID ENCINIAS, Sheriff of Bent County, Colorado;
SUE KURTZ, Sheriff of San Juan County, Colorado;
JAMES (JIM) CASIAS, Sheriff of Las Animas County, Colorado;
GARRETT WIGGINS, Sheriff of Routt County, Colorado;
DOUGLAS N. DARR, Sheriff of Adams County, Colorado;
COLORADO OUTFITTERS ASSOCIATION;
COLORADO FARM BUREAU;
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION;
MAGPUL INDUSTRIES;
USA LIBERTY ARMS;
OUTDOOR BUDDIES, INC.;
WOMEN FOR CONCEALED CARRY;
COLORADO STATE SHOOTING ASSOCIATION;
HAMILTON FAMILY ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a FAMILY SHOOTING CENTER AT CHERRY CREEK STATE PARK;
DAVID STRUMILLO;
DAVID BAYNE;
DYLAN HARRELL;
ROCKY MOUNTAIN SHOOTERS SUPPLY;
2ND AMENDMENT GUNSMITH & SHOOTER SUPPLY,LLC;
BURRUD ARMS INC. D/B/A JENSEN ARMS;
GREEN MOUNTAIN GUNS;
JERRY’S OUTDOOR SPORTS;
GRAND PRIX GUNS;
SPECIALTY SPORTS & SUPPLY;
GOODS FOR THE WOODS;
John Hickenlooper, a self-described “recovering geologist now on loan to public service,” was elected Governor in 2010. His unconventional road to the Capitol began when he left the oilfields of western Colorado in the late 1980s and opened the state’s first brewpub. As he says, “I went from exploring oil to selling beer.” His business grew, helping to revitalize a now popular neighborhood in downtown Denver, and he became active in Denver’s civic life. One thing led to another, until, goaded by friends and other business leaders, he successfully ran for Mayor of Denver in 2003.
This case will consider a century-old precedent concerning the scope of the Privileges and Immunities and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. If the Court sides with Petitioners Otis McDonald, et al., it may reverse the Slaughterhouse line of cases and incorporate the Second Amendment—and possibly the entire Bill of Rights—against the States. On the other hand, if the Court sides with Respondent, City of Chicago, et al., it will uphold the Slaughterhouse cases and restrict the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The views expressed in Intellihub.com articles are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Intellihub.com. Intellihub.com will not be held responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in Intellihub.com articles. Intellihub.com reserves the right to remove articles from the website.
Sheriffs & Citizens join together to bring this action in defense of the Second and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States
WASHINGTON, DC – FEBRUARY 25: Governor John Hickenlooper of Colorado speaks to the media after a meeting with President Barack Obama at the Eisenhower Executive Office Building February 25, 2011 in Washington, DC. Obama met with Democratic governors to discuss the ways Washington and the states can work together to create jobs and benefit the economy. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Dave Kopel is Research Director of the Independence Institute; an Associate Policy Analyst with the Cato Institute, in Washington; and adjunct Professor of Advanced Constitutional Law at the Universtiy of Denver’s Sturm College of Law. His website is www.davekopel.org. He is a regular panelist on Colorado Public Television’s “Colorado Inside Out”, and a blogger on the Volokh Conspiracy (the world’s leading law eblog).
Published on May 17, 2013 — 16,935 views 05/19/2013 @ 5:00pm
The Independence Institute held a press conference on May 17, 2013 announcing the lawsuit against the new anti-gun bills passed by the Colorado legislature and signed by Governor John Hickenlooper. The lead attorney is Dave Kopel.
1. On March 20, 2013, Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper signed two measures that severely restrict citizens’ rights to own, use, manufacture, sell, or transfer firearms and firearms accessories.
2. HB 12242. House Bill 13 – 1224 (“HB 1224”) bans outright all ammunition magazines sold or acquired after July 1, 2013 that hold more than 15 rounds of ammunition. HB 1224 also bans most other magazines of any size because it prohibits smaller magazines that are “designed to be readily converted” to hold more than 15 rounds of ammunition.
54 SHERIFFS:
JOHN B. COOKE, Sheriff of Weld County, Colorado;
TERRY MAKETA, Sheriff of El Paso County, Colorado;
JUSTIN SMITH, Sheriff of Larimer County, Colorado;
DAVID A. WEAVER, Sheriff of Douglas County, Colorado;
BRUCE W. HARTMAN, Sheriff of Gilpin County, Colorado;
KEN PUTNAM, Sheriff of Cheyenne County, Colorado;
DENNIS SPRUELL, Sheriff of Montezuma County, Colorado;
TIM JANTZ, Sheriff of Moffat County, Colorado;
JERRY MARTIN, Sheriff of Dolores County, Colorado;
MIKE ENSMINGER, Sheriff of Teller County, Colorado;
SHAYNE HEAP, Sheriff of Elbert County, Colorado;
CHAD DAY, Sheriff of Yuma County, Colorado;
FRED D. MCKEE, Sheriff of Delta County, Colorado;
LOU VALLARIO, Sheriff of Garfield County, Colorado;
FRED HOSSELKUS, Sheriff of Mineral County, Colorado;
BRETT L. POWELL, Sheriff of Logan County, Colorado;
JAMES FAULL, Sheriff of Prowers County, Colorado;
LARRY KUNTZ, Sheriff of Washington County, Colorado;
BRIAN E. NORTON, Sheriff of Rio Grande County, Colorado;
DUKE SCHIRARD, Sheriff of La Plata County, Colorado;
JIM BEICKER, Sheriff of Fremont County, Colorado;
RONALD BRUCE, Sheriff of Hinsdale County, Colorado;
CHRIS S. JOHNSON, Sheriff of Otero County, Colorado;
FRED JOBE, Sheriff of Custer County, Colorado;
DONALD KRUEGER, Sheriff of Clear Creek County, Colorado;
JAMES CRONE, Sheriff of Morgan County, Colorado;
SI WOODRUFF, Sheriff of Rio Blanco County, Colorado;
TOM RIDNOUR, Sheriff of Kit Carson County, Colorado;
TOM NESTOR, Sheriff of Lincoln County, Colorado;
STAN HILKEY, Sheriff of Mesa County, Colorado;
FORREST FRAZEE, Sheriff of Kiowa County, Colorado;
RICK DUNLAP, Sheriff of Montrose County, Colorado;
TED B. MINK, Sheriff of Jefferson County, Colorado;
DAVE STONG, Sheriff of Alamosa County, Colorado;
FRED WEGENER, Sheriff of Park County, Colorado;
BRUCE NEWMAN, Sheriff of HuerfanoCounty, Colorado;
RANDY PECK, Sheriff of Sedgwick County, Colorado;
DOMINIC MATTIVI, JR., Sheriff of Ouray County, Colorado;
JOHN MINOR, Sheriff of Summit County, Colorado;
SCOTT FISCHER, Sheriff of Jackson County, Colorado;
PETER GONZALEZ, Sheriff of Archuleta County, Colorado;
RICK BESECKER, Sheriff of Gunnison County, Colorado;
CHARLES “ROB”URBACH, Sheriff of Phillips County, Colorado;
ROD FENSKE, Sheriff of Lake County, Colorado;
GRAYSON ROBINSON, Sheriff of Arapahoe County, Colorado;
DAVIDD. CAMPBELL, Sheriff of Baca County, Colorado;
MIKE NORRIS, Sheriff of Saguache County, Colorado;
AMOS MEDINA, Sheriff of Costilla County, Colorado;
MILES CLARK, Sheriff of Crowley County, Colorado;
DAVID ENCINIAS, Sheriff of Bent County, Colorado;
SUE KURTZ, Sheriff of San Juan County, Colorado;
JAMES (JIM) CASIAS, Sheriff of Las Animas County, Colorado;
GARRETT WIGGINS, Sheriff of Routt County, Colorado;
DOUGLAS N. DARR, Sheriff of Adams County, Colorado;
COLORADO OUTFITTERS ASSOCIATION;
COLORADO FARM BUREAU;
NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION;
MAGPUL INDUSTRIES;
USA LIBERTY ARMS;
OUTDOOR BUDDIES, INC.;
WOMEN FOR CONCEALED CARRY;
COLORADO STATE SHOOTING ASSOCIATION;
HAMILTON FAMILY ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a FAMILY SHOOTING CENTER AT CHERRY CREEK STATE PARK;
DAVID STRUMILLO;
DAVID BAYNE;
DYLAN HARRELL;
ROCKY MOUNTAIN SHOOTERS SUPPLY;
2ND AMENDMENT GUNSMITH & SHOOTER SUPPLY,LLC;
BURRUD ARMS INC. D/B/A JENSEN ARMS;
GREEN MOUNTAIN GUNS;
JERRY’S OUTDOOR SPORTS;
GRAND PRIX GUNS;
SPECIALTY SPORTS & SUPPLY;
GOODS FOR THE WOODS;
John Hickenlooper, a self-described “recovering geologist now on loan to public service,” was elected Governor in 2010. His unconventional road to the Capitol began when he left the oilfields of western Colorado in the late 1980s and opened the state’s first brewpub. As he says, “I went from exploring oil to selling beer.” His business grew, helping to revitalize a now popular neighborhood in downtown Denver, and he became active in Denver’s civic life. One thing led to another, until, goaded by friends and other business leaders, he successfully ran for Mayor of Denver in 2003.
This case will consider a century-old precedent concerning the scope of the Privileges and Immunities and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. If the Court sides with Petitioners Otis McDonald, et al., it may reverse the Slaughterhouse line of cases and incorporate the Second Amendment—and possibly the entire Bill of Rights—against the States. On the other hand, if the Court sides with Respondent, City of Chicago, et al., it will uphold the Slaughterhouse cases and restrict the scope of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The views expressed in Intellihub.com articles are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Intellihub.com. Intellihub.com will not be held responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in Intellihub.com articles. Intellihub.com reserves the right to remove articles from the website.
A fitting introduction to Suspicious0bservers documentary is that 2012 will be remembered as the year that Alternative Media dominated corporate mainstream media. Corporate Mainstream Media no longer has the credibility, trust or the attention that it once enjoyed. Alternative Media is a force that cannot be defeated because it’s every individual on the planet. The paradigm of corporate control and domination is history. Just who is the Alternative Media..?
YOU ARE THE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA!
Suspicious0bservers has provided this video to the public.
The views expressed in Intellihub.com articles are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Intellihub.com. Intellihub.com will not be held responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in Intellihub.com articles. Intellihub.com reserves the right to remove articles from the website.
GRAPHIC Video of CIA & al-Qa’ida Mercenaries Executing Syrian Civilians as Propaganda Calculated to Demonize Muslims Worldwide
Special Report
Syrians rally to show their support for their President Bashar al-Assad (photo) in the capital Damascus on April 30, 2011, as Russia reiterated its hard stance over Syria after refusing to endorse a US call for an investigation into the bloodshed during clashes between government forces and anti-regime protesters accusing the West of ‘double standards and bias’. AFP PHOTO/LOUAI BESHARA (LOUAI BESHARA/AFP/Getty Images)
Extreme violence is now permitted on YouTube of CIA & al-Qa’ida Mercenaries Executing Syrian Civilians in a calculated US Government Operation meant to generate support for the Syrian invasion that the Obama Administration has been so eager to initiate. Although no evidence exists as to the identity of these mercenaries, its plain to anyone understanding the strategy of those in power that these executions would not be tolerated to be on YouTube, unless these were Google & YouTube supported channels, under the direction of the US Government.
The purpose of these videos is to demonize Muslims worldwide and generate hatred for ISLAM, and Sharia Law. The identity of the perpetrators of this horrific execution is unknown, which is a clear indication of Intelligence CIA Operatives. It’s clearly meant to terrorize anyone watching. Note that these videos are increasing in number, and the YouTube channels are not censored even though one of the most egregious violations of Google and YouTube Policies. It’s the age old question – Cui bono?
Who benefits from these horrific scenes of violence? These executions are meant to generate hatred for these supposed Syrian Rebels – which they are not. Question: If you were a Syrian Military soldier, would you film this type of atrocity, one which is against every military rule of law? Plain and simple, these are al-Qa’ida Operatives who are trained to do these types of operations.
The Controllers that are manipulating our government and public opinion to get the US to support al-Qa’ida and bring US Troops into Syria are the beneficiaries from the public seeing these videos and believing that the perpetrators are Syrian Military. One needs to take a hard look at who benefits from this type of violence and wake up to the reality that there is a great evil whose actions like this are to generate support for the US to get involved and take care of this problem. Once again, problem, reaction – solution! And the solution is the same battle cry it’s been for 2 plus years.
Published on May 17, 2013 President Barack Obama administration is financing these terrorists and this is how they handle prisoners atrocity against Geneva convention with barbaric execution mafia style. This is what the Quran teaches for anyone not Muslim this is how you would be treated in ISLAM Sharia Law that is rampant worldwide as we speak this is no joke people headed to a neighborhood near you WAKE UP free world ISLAM is terrorism the Quran makes it clear.
The views expressed in Intellihub.com articles are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Intellihub.com. Intellihub.com will not be held responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in Intellihub.com articles. Intellihub.com reserves the right to remove articles from the website.
Years of research into Geoengineering among scholars and scientists has proven the technology of Geoengineering to be an inexpensive technique to offset Climate Change, and the programs are ready for mainstream media. The introduction of Geoengineering to the public is now taking place in mainstream media.
As we shall now see, an ex-military bio-engineer, Kristen Meghan, exposes the long standing Air Force covert operation in Geoengineering taking place right in plain sight. Empirical evidence in the form of video evidence is in the thousands – just Google: Geoengineering – one gets 1,140,000 results, and the term Chemtrail produces about 1,530,000 results. People all over the world are witnessing this phenomenon and by mainstream media ignoring this very fact only serves as evidence that a Top-Secret Covert Military and Corporate Operations is in progress.
Incidentally, when talking about Geoengineering, although there are thousands of research documents and military papers on the subject, even US House Discussions on budget appropriations, it remains off the radar and is treated as though it doesn’t exist – except in a Conspiracy Theorist context.
The good news in a sense is that issues like Geoengineering and GMO and NDAA and False-Flags, are empowering the Alternative Media – so keep up the good work mainstream media. Censorship by omission is the modus operandi of mainstream corporate media, and it could be argued that this is the driving force behind the domination by Alternative Media.
Alternative Media now holds the public trust and attention – a significant responsibility and a challenge to become more informed, adept and empowered to get the truth to the public.
The origin and genesis of Global Warming, Climate Change and Geoengineering is The Royal Society. Wikipedia describes The Royal Society as:
The Royal Society of London for Improving Natural Knowledge, known as the Royal Society, is a learned society for science, and is possibly the oldest such society in existence.[1] Founded in November 1660, it was granted a Royal Charter by King Charles II as the “Royal Society of London”.
Now, recently, an Ex-Military Bio-Environmental Engineer, whose name is Kristen Meghan, was filmed at the 2013 Atlanta Music Liberty Fest talking to the audience about Geoengineering. Her in-depth first-hand knowledge is about the secret use of chemical components in Air Force Operations.
Global warming has been a household topic since the early 1990s, and has been pushed by the Federal government as a crucial threat to our environment. The U.S. Government has been the leading polluter by way of Geo-engineering, Chemtrails, and military operations. Linda Marshall from the Feminist Peace Network stated, “The US military is responsible for the most egregious and widespread pollution of the planet, yet this information and accompanying documentation goes almost entirely unreported. This impact includes uninhibited use of fossil fuels, massive creation of greenhouse gases, and extensive release of radioactive and chemical contaminants into the air, water, and soil.” Chemtrails involve the deliberate spraying of hazardous materials into the atmosphere that goes back over 30 years. Also known as cloud seeding, the U.S. Government has been spraying harmful chemicals and heavy metals into the atmosphere for numerous reasons. Some say this is to prevent global warming; however, the lack of media acknowledged Chemtrails tells a different story. David Peterson from the Carnicom Institution provided the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with soil samples that were retrieved after planes had sprayed particles above the land; this information was to be used for a Chemtrails Research Initiative. Chester France, from the EPA’s Assessment and Standards Division, refused to analyze these samples and provided Mr. Peterson with assumptive data. Mr. France responded saying he was mistaken, stating the EPA had no knowledge of Chemtrails and evaded the information through a distractive response. Despite Mr. France’s opinion, it is his ethical responsibility to analyze these samples, even if he were to inform Mr. Peterson he would have to fund the lab analysis and soil samples.
This story mirrors many situations like this throughout the country, including my own encounter with the EPA when I worked in Bioenvironmental Engineering in the United State Air Force. Why would the EPA refuse to acknowledge Chemtrails? Consequently, a world renowned neurosurgeon turned activist and researcher, addresses the health effects associated with constituents used in Chemtrails. Specifically, Dr. Blaylock discusses nano-sized particles and how the intranasal route of exposure makes the spraying of these hazardous particles even more dangerous. Additionally, he goes on to explain how at first he dismissed the reality of Chemtrails, but the overwhelming evidence convinced him otherwise. He states, “I pray the pilots who are spraying this dangerous substance fully understand that they are destroying the lives and health of their families as well” (Blaylock, 2012). What has not been addressed is the systemic impact on hearing and balance through the ototoxicity of these heavy metal particulates coupled with exposures from pharmaceuticals containing ototoxic drugs! There is innumerous evidence ignored by the mainstream media that is available for the general public, which includes several organizations that champion exposing these practices to the general public.
For example, it is admitted there are elite members of society that support and finance the spraying of hazardous chemicals and materials into our atmosphere in the disguise of preventing man-made global warming; one of these promoters and financial backers is none other than Bill Gates (Huff, 2012). Spraying this material alters how the natural sunlight, that living things rely on for nourishment, is able to be absorbed. While continued to be labeled a conspiracy theory, the U.S. owns over twenty patents surrounding weather modification, stratospheric aerosol spraying and the use of RFID to control the environment. All of the processes listed within these patents not only disrupts our ecosystem, but is an additional danger to human life and our environmental cycle. Documentaries such as, “What In The World Are They Spraying”, and “Why In The World Are They Spraying”, expose the validity of Geoengineering and Chemtrails and why such a hoax it being put upon the American people. The United Nations Agenda 21 is the driving force behind sustainable development by way of population control through soft kill. The carcinogenic materials sprayed upon us have been directly linked to the historical rise in neurological disorders and respiratory illnesses. With all this information readily available and the current data on the environmental and health effects widely known, what is being done to truly conserve what resources we have left?
Blaylock, R.M.D. (2012). Chemtrails, nanoaluminum, and neurodegenerative, and neurodevelopmental effects. Health Freedom News, 30(3), 20-21
Dykes, A. (2012, December). Why Obama will revive the push for co2 taxes and the “green” agenda is about control and profits, not saving the environment. Infowars The Magazine, 1(4), 20-2
Huff, E. (2012, Jul 26). Bill Gates funds scheme to spray artificial “planet-cooling” sulfur particles into atmosphere. Retrieved from http://geoengineeringwatch.org
Messamore, W.E. (April 2012). The Number One Worst Polluter on Earth. Retrieved from
Rappoport, J. (2012, October). How the now hijacked “save the planet”. Infowars The Magazine, 1(3), 52-53.
Intermission…
The video that went viral has 127,014 views as of May 15, 2013 @ 1:00pm EST. Many sites have reported on this important story from an insider – a Military Whistleblower who is afforded legal protections for her bravery. Intellihub.com congratulates Kristen Meghan for her bravery and for coming forward even while under great threat for telling the truth. Here is the video filmed at the 2013 Atlanta Music Liberty Fest.
The views expressed in Intellihub.com articles are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Intellihub.com. Intellihub.com will not be held responsible or liable for any inaccurate or incorrect statements contained in Intellihub.com articles. Intellihub.com reserves the right to remove articles from the website.
