LOW LIFE SCUM BAGS

scum bags

LOW LIFE SCUM BAGS

This morning I was awakened early by a friend who wanted to get together and have some breakfast. I was surprised that she wanted to get together so early but I obliged and was grateful for the morning conversation and the ride into work.

Every morning as a matter of ritual I come down stairs, pet the cats take my medications and vitamin supplements and brew coffee. I then move to my laptop and go over the headlines of the day.

The mainstream headlines are slowly taking over the internet only because of the efforts of many social networks that have learned how to censor what they feel is sensitive and or offensive material that they feel should not be shared on a news feed.

Last week 21WIRE reported on Facebook’s new communitarian policy whereby readers can ‘flag’ content as “fake news” if they believe it’s not real, or if they do not like it. In the wake of the Charlie Hebdo False Flag event, the social media giant is now allowing governments to determine what is “good free speech,” and what is not.

If you listen carefully you can hear the death rattle of free speech on the internet and the value of independent observances of what is happening in the world.

The danger of the communitarian nanny state is not too far away and the forced collectivism in the hive mind is now going to be mandatory and for some it could not come sooner as militant “thought police” aim at being voluntary Winston Smiths , finding ways to censor and shut down any rebuttal or thought that may place the party and or government in a bad light.

According to 21wire, “An article that many people have reported as a hoax or chose to delete will get reduced distribution in the News Feed”. If the article is flagged by any anonymous person (most likely, from a political opponent of the news story in question), then the post creator is hit with the alert that says, “many people have reported that this story contains false information”. It’s common sense that just because someone else says something is false, or true for that matter, does not mean that is the case.

The next tool They wish to use against unpopular or subversive speech is much larger, and even more blunt, which is Facebook’s emerging strategy which appears to ‘customize’ regional governments’ ability to drop a censorship curtain down on the social media platform in a particular country.

This means that Facebook or Facebook’s owner Mark Zuckerberg the man that changed his profile picture to Je Suis Charlie after the Charlie Hebdo attacks should change his profile picture to read “Je Suis Hypocrite.”

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has opposed Facebook’s latest Trojan horse which has been disguised under the Orwellian banner of “compliance with content restriction”. It appears that Facebook’s motivation might be 100% financial, as they want to maintain access to large advertizing markets and thus will comply with any nondemocratic draconian measure suggested by any government in order to “stay in the game” in that market.

The EFF adds that, “As governments grow aware of the fact that stifling speech is as easy as submitting an order to a corporation, the number of those orders will drastically increase.”

It seems that good old fashioned subversive speech is now under fire on the internet which may be an indicator that a repeat performance of the “dirty war” is now at hand and anyone who questions the home grown battle ground will face disappearance, exile, prison time or even death at the hands of the government.

We now know that top U.S. officials and agencies, including the State Department, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the Defense Department, were fully aware of the creation of the “dirty war’ in South America known as Operation Condor.

While Condor will go down in history as an experiment in weeding out communists and alleged terrorists, it is also the dirty war that left many dissidents and subversives without a home and most of them taken in the middle of the night and killed because of their stands against the torture of innocent people and the thwarting of the democratic republics that were established in Chile and Argentina.

Operation Condor was a destabilization Campaign against the Governments of Chile and Argentina on September 11th, 1973.

It all began with the Johnson administration and their generous amounts of money totaling into the tens of millions to buy off the election in order to insure a victory for Christian Democrat Eduardo Frei as President. Frei beat the Socialist Party candidate Salvador Allende.

By 1970, it was time for new elections and of course Frei was ineligible to succeed himself and so Allende was the favorite to win the next election.

Allende being a Communist became a problem for the Nixon administration.

The super-secret 40 Committee, a high-level body chaired by Henry Kissinger, with representatives from the State Department, CIA and Pentagon, decided that a massive electoral intervention would likely spark a backlash.

As you can see the first idea was to rig the election.

Sound familiar?

In 1973 the CIA is urged to create covert operation to prepare a preemptive military coup. The man who was involved in these operations of course was Henry Kissinger.

Kissinger declared, “I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a country go Communist because of the irresponsibility of its own people.” But he and CIA Director Richard M. Helms blocked the proposed pre-election coup as unworkable. More time was needed, they argued.

Allende of course won the election.

The Director of Central Intelligence told the group that President Nixon had decided that an Allende regime in Chile was not acceptable to the United States.

The US involvement in coup planning began even before Allende’s election victory, under the codename FUBELT, with action plans prepared for Kissinger’s consideration. One group of officers working under CIA direction carried out the assassination of General Rene Schneider, a pro-Allende officer, in an unsuccessful attempt to spark a full-scale coup before Allende could take office.

The CIA set up a fascist organization called Fatherland and Liberty, headed by a former public relations man for Ford Motor Company, Federico Willoughby McDonald, who became Pinochet’s press secretary after the coup.

Interesting how “Fatherland” and “Homeland” have a nice ring to them about now.

The CIA helped the military in Chile draw up lists of those to be exterminated. On September 10, 1973, the day before the junta struck, the names of 3,000 high-level and 20,000 mid-level leaders of popular organizations — trade unions, student groups, tenants’ groups, peasant committees, civil rights and civil liberties groups, left-wing political parties — were distributed to the death squads. Virtually all those who did not flee the country were hunted down and murdered.

If anyone remembers the movie Disaparecido, starring Sissy Spacek or the book The Execution of Charles Horman, you will recall the story of Horman. He was a Harvard graduate with left-wing sympathies and became one of tens of thousands of workers and intellectuals named on death lists drawn up in the period of the coup, with the assistance of US intelligence operatives.

Artists, political cartoonists and journalists that were not sympathetic to the coup were rounded up and executed. Many were found dead in their homes while others were rounded up and tortured. Many never returned.

It is hard to believe that in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo massacre, where journalists were killed because of their art and expression that Facebook now wished to contribute to a dirty war that is having a sort of resurrection with the same names and personnel that were there in 1973 pulling the same type of dirty war to destabilize France, Ukraine and even the United States.

A Senate hearing opened this morning with Code Pink protesters trying to arrest former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger for “war crimes.” While Vietnam and Cambodia were being shouted out by protesters there was also a few shout outs against Operation Condor and the war crimes that left thousands of South Americans dead or missing.

The protesters, bearing signs reading “Kissinger War Criminal” rushed up behind the 91-year-old diplomat at the witness table of the Senate Armed Services Committee, which was holding a hearing on global challenges and the U.S. national security strategy.

Chairman John McCain (R-Ariz.) said he would call recess until Capitol Police removed Code Pink from the room.

He stated in disgust, “I’ve been a member of this committee for many years, and I have never seen anything as disgraceful and outrageous and despicable as the last demonstration that just took place,” McCain said, which led to shout-backs from the protesters.

“You know, you’re going to have to shut up, or I’m going to have you arrested. If we can’t get the Capital Hill Police in here immediately…. Get out of here, you low-life scum,” McCain added.

If that wasn’t bad enough George Shultz stepped in and also shouted down the protestors. Now I know what the right wing feels about Code Pink. I know that perhaps there are many out there that wishes groups like this would back off, but the truth is the truth no matter who the messenger is.

George Schultz was Reagan’s Secretary of State while Donald Rumsfeld was selling the components of nerve gas to Saddam Hussein. So George Schultz hardly qualifies as a “character reference” that distracts from the war crimes of Kissinger.

As for McCain calling members of Code Pink “scum,” McCain’s record as a scumbag seems to be overlooked by many people. Some people believe that his negligence may have killed sailors during the 1967 fire on the USS Forrestal. McCain has made claims about this accident that differ dramatically from parts of the official Navy report and accounts of reliable eyewitnesses.

In considering the 1967 catastrophe, it is important to note that the official report concluded that no individual bore responsibility for the fire or its spread. There are a number of conflicting accounts of the Forrestal accident, but here is the story as based on the strongest sources. The fire started at 10:51 a.m. Saturday, July 29, 1967, as 30-year-old Lt. Cmdr. John McCain sat on the port side of the Forrestal in his A-4 Skyhawk going through preflight checks. To his right was Lt. Cmdr. Fred White, also in an A-4 Skyhawk attack aircraft.

A Zuni rocket on another airplane accidentally fired and flew across the flight deck, passing through White’s auxiliary fuel tank and falling into the ocean. Fuel spilled onto the deck from White’s craft and ignited. McCain told his biographer, Robert Timberg, and repeats in his own book “Faith of My Fathers,” that the rocket hit his own plane and knocked two bombs from it into the burning fuel as he scrambled out of his cockpit and raced to safety across the deck.

There was, in fact, a single bomb — not two — that dropped to the deck. It exploded 90 seconds after the fire broke out, intensifying the blaze until it raged out of control. White and Thomas Ott, McCain’s parachute rigger, were among the first to be killed instantly or mortally injured, along with most of the firefighting crew. McCain’s plane captain, Robert Zwerlein, was one of those who suffered fatal wounds at this point.

A camera on the deck recorded images showing that the Zuni rocket struck White’s plane. The Navy report later attributed the dropped bomb to White’s plane, although the film footage does not seem to establish this definitively. However, McCain has said many times that the Zuni rocket caused the bomb (two bombs in McCain’s version) to fall from his own craft.

Some of those who were on the Forrestal and other persons familiar with the ordnance said that because the rocket did not hit McCain’s craft, only actions by the pilot could have caused any bomb to fall from McCain’s Skyhawk. These sources — who spoke under the condition that they not be publicly identified — agree with each other that, if any bomb fell from the McCain airplane, it was because of actions that he took either in error or panic upon seeing the fire on the deck or in his hasty exit from the plane.

Dipping into history we see that Pentagon records reveal McCain had collaborated with the Vietnamese. McCain made propaganda broadcasts for the North Vietnamese a sticky issue that was covered up during his presidential campaign.

I doubt anyone in Code Pink is as hated as John McCain by former POW/MIAs for frustrating the efforts of a full accounting of Vietnam POW/MIAs. I am sure we can go back and figure out just what his purpose was in destabilizing Ukraine, collaborating with neo Nazis and posing for selfies with leaders of ISIS. So, if McCain wants to call anyone “scum,” all he needs do is look in the mirror.

Meanwhile his former partner in crime Sara Palin has now stirred up an issue with Fox news commentator Bill O’Reilly. Palin has always been a firecracker for the GOP making outrageous statements that sound as if she is a candidate with a borderline personality disorder. Well, it seems that O’Reilly initially took a dig at Palin, Donald Trump and Chris Christie in a tease for “The O’Reilly Factor” speaking of the trio’s possible participation in the 2016 Republican primary. “Wow,” he said. “Talk about a reality show.”

This angered Palin and she made it known of her disgust with O’Reilly on the Sean Hannity show.

The former Alaska governor and 2008 GOP vice presidential candidate said, “Oh, what a reality show that would be, yuck, yuck, Well the left doesn’t do that. They take this serious, because this is war.”

So Palin in her anger and with her loose lips says it best in all of the propaganda: “This is war.”

Yes, by all means, Ms. Palin, this is war. It is a war where the set up is that you can no longer be subversive and speak your mind as a journalist for fear of repercussion or worse.

Sadly in the eyes of both Palin and McCain people who speak against the government’s crimes and hypocrisy are low life scum and the contempt they have for you and me should be noted as dangerous and threatening to a functional democracy.

David Crowley, a popular conspiracy theorist and filmmaker, and his family were found dead in their Apple Valley, Minnesota home on January 17th. Authorities say that Crowley, his wife, and their 5-year-old daughter have probably been dead since before Christmas. Neighbors say that they thought the family was away for the holidays. But, after seeing no movement and the same lights on day and night, one neighbor looked into a window, saw three bodies and a handgun and called police. The deaths have been ruled a murder-suicide. A note was found but its contents have not been divulged. The family’s dog, which was emaciated and thin, was taken in by Crowley’s brother.

Crowley was making a film called “Gray State,” which explores many favorite themes among conspiracy theorists. According to a friend, Jason Allen, Crowley contacted him on Dec. 17 asking Allen to join the project as an executive producer. In the email, Crowley wrote that he was “exhausted” and that he had almost completely abandoned the project.

Other friends say that there was no hint of financial or any other kind of trouble in the family. One friend, Mason Hendricks, thinks that the end of the family’s lives “may have been a joint decision.” Apple Valley Police Chief Jon Rechtzigel noted that there had never been any police calls to the home prior to this.

The sum opinion of all of it is that horrible things happen to good people.

Of course, conspiracy theorists believe that the family was murdered by the government because of the overall message of the film Gray State.

In the end, a man, his wife and their child are dead. This is a tragedy no matter what David Crowley was doing.

You may also remember Michael Hastings. He was a journalist for Rolling Stone who was killed in a car “accident” back in 2013. Hastings was working on a story about the CIA. Just a few hours before his death, he had contacted a lawyer connected with Wikileaks because he discovered he was under investigation by the FBI.

Assassination is an all-too-common tactic of alphabet agencies, and for decades they have been able to murder someone and set up the circumstances to make it appear as a suicide, car accident, or a heart attack. It’s a bit more subtle than jack-boots and concentration camps, but it does the same job.

The internet and citizen journalists have been involved in openly divulging information that the chosen “news” filters have neglected to report. Many people are grateful that there are websites that do the old fashioned expose on corruption in government. However there has to be some sort of political agenda afoot and while we cheer the new media’s successes in trying to topple an empire’s hold on the people — we also want to attack certain messengers that are delivering uncomfortable information.

When you turn a country into a battlefield everyone is suspect. You begin to see people disappear, journalists, artists, playwrights, musicians anyone who expresses their anger and fear over a world out of control.

Of course it was John McCain who coined the phrase “Battlefield America” and it takes his rogue sidekick like Sarah Palin to declare war against glib journalists who have stern opinions about their political parties.

Now we are beginning to see that the political riffraff are all scum bags because even though we hoped that our votes would have changed this type of tyranny, the names and faces that were part of the election, and the old faces of the shadow government continue to oppress us and remind us just who controls the government.

Freedom of speech, the free press and the ability to speak one’s mind is now dying a painful death.

SYNARCHY

the great synarchy

SYNARCHY

Many times we have spoken about the open conspiracy of a gradual takeover of this planet, and the various governments and religions being forced into some strange and alien nationalist apotheosis.

The questions that keep us guessing are those that deal with the possibility of a single global elite with an agenda that goes beyond simply keeping itself very rich and wealthy at the expense of those whom they have enslaved financially. All too quickly the majority of conspiracy theorists point to Jewish bankers and Zionists as the hidden hand. Their goal, purportedly, is to obtain wealth and to empty the coffers so that they can have control over the poor.

While the banking cabal has always been the chief demon in conspiracy circles, it is time to open your mind to other possibilities. There are certainly groups that want to rule the world for other reasons. With the increasing globalization of political and economic institutions, it has become easier for a relatively small group to deceive itself into quite staggeringly influential positions. One cabal in particular reveals alarmingly what a small group, driven by a fanatical belief system, can achieve from the shadows.

While many conspiracy writers and observers tend to talk about the material world within conspiracy history and those who always seem to have control in that world, the spiritual realm in which globalization thrives is a very frightening and somewhat complex thing to understand.

Many religiously-oriented conspiracy theorists will cast aspersions on the Masons or the Jesuits, accusing them of controlling of the spiritual realm of what appears to be an imperial cult. However, it becomes more complicated when dealing with the priestcraft that takes place within the spiritual matrix of the elite world that many do not understand.

Every major step in the development of the New World Order, from a simple ideology to a worldwide super state can be traced back to a very specific ideology, which upholds rule by a chosen body of spiritual elite or secret brotherhood from behind the scenes. The brotherhood plays a role in the hidden hand the guides us towards this Order. It can also be seen as a manifestation of a Luciferian spirituality that professes to enlighten practitioners through mysticism and magic.

What we are talking about here is something called “Synarchy.” This shadowy politico-occult movement is based on the ideas of French mystic and philosopher Joseph Alexandre Saint-Yves, the Marquis d’Alveydre, in opposition to the rise of anarchy in the second half of the nineteenth century. To him the ideal state was a rigid social hierarchy topped by an elite that is predestined to rule absolutely at odds with the then-emerging concepts of democracy, individual liberty and social mobility.

He adopted the idea, popular in nineteenth-century esoteric and theosophical circles, that spiritually advanced “masters” existed in Agartha, a hidden realm in the Himalayas. He confided in his closest associates that he had been visited by its emissaries.

Another significant aspect of his version of history was that clandestine societies had transmitted the secret of Synarchy throughout the ages. It comes as no surprise to discover that his “spiritual fathers of Synarchy” were the usual suspects, the Knights Templar.

In the old stories of the Holy Grail, there were said to be “Grail Knights,” also explicitly called “Templars,” who operated behind the scenes to guide society, themselves taking orders from this mysterious entity called “the Grail.” In Parzival, Wolfram von Eschenbach wrote that “any Templar whom God should bestow on a distant people for their lord must forbid them to ask his name or lineage, but must help them gain their rights….” This is the basis of the story of Lohengrin, the “Swan Knight” who disappeared whenever anyone was so rude as to ask which family he came from. The relationship between the human “Templars” of secre ancestry that ruled kingdoms in conjunction with the mysterious “Grail” object is a form of Synarchy.

The Synarchy that may be in power now is a government run by a form of priesthood and is ruled by a secret society; however the societies are not always the ones that are named by conspiracy theorists. All of them, however, have played a role in establishing the United States. The formation of this nation was perhaps the mother of all conspiracies. It began with a divinely-inspired writ of insurrection against the crown and a constitution that would be the chief omnipotent cornerstone for the new order.

Many Christians in America believe that the establishment of the United States was based on Christian values and ideologies. This is only half true, because the rebellious nature of the insurrection was purely Luciferian, and in some cases bordering on Hermetic Arcanum and Gnosticism.

From the very beginning of Christianity, the Gnostics, or those who called themselves of a “different opinion” than the Christians, began a systematic opposition to the Apostles, and adopted an “elitist view” against the general teaching of the Gospel.

They were of the opinion that the dogmas of the Gospel were good for the common people, but that the superior minds of the ruling oligarchy required a “secret doctrine” which was reserved for the elite.

The mysteries of Christianity were then to be transformed back into the mysteries that were taught in the secret schools by beings that interacted with humans. These beings were of course considered to be extra-terrestrial and of superior intelligence. These “Secret Chiefs” dictated their ideology to the elite, and with this, Synarchist governments were formed in the image of “democratic republics.” Each secret society has played their role in sustaining what is termed the “cult of blood and soil.”

This gave birth to a movement called Martinism, and which in turn gave birth to the Beastmen of the French Revolution, the first politically- organized terrorist organization, known as “the Terror” or “the Children of Satan.”

The Martinist Order was founded in Lyon, France, based on the “philosophy” of four of the most important Masonic cult leaders of the eighteenth century: Martinez de Pasqually, Louis Claude de Saint-Martin, Jean-Baptiste Willermoz, and Joseph de Maistre. Although Maistre was not a founding member of Martinism, his participation in the original founding period, created in Lyon by the three others, made him one of the most important elements of this original leadership.

During the period leading to the French Revolution, there were 282 Masonic lodges in France, including 81 lodges of the Grand Orient in Paris alone, 16 in Lyon, 10 in Toulouse, 10 in Montpellier, 10 in Bordeaux, and 6 in Marseille.

During the French Revolution, Martinists such as Joseph de Maistre of Savoy, and Fabre d’Olivet of the Languedoc, and Cagliostro of Italy, were the more notorious. During the nineteenth century, one of the most active Martinist leaders was Charles Nodier, who purportedly became the Grand Master of the highly controversial Priory of Sion, which later influenced the guiding lights that helped to form the European Common Market.

Most of the so-called “classic” French literary figures of that period, such as Victor Hugo, Honore de Balzac, Alexandre Dumas Son, Delacroix, and Gerard de Nerval, etc., were members of the Martinist cult.

Keep in mind that Martinism is a cult of the elite, the religion of the superior man, and of the oligarch. This is why the absolute precondition for this cult to even exist resides in the idea that man must be reduced to a animal, a corrupt beast. It is this Martinist cult of the elite that wishes to jumpstart another attempt at the New Dawn, the Age of Aquarius or Dionysius. The elite’s secret is that they are now being guided by Secret Chiefs, or what they believe are beings of divine race who dictate policy that sincerely has no basis in morality.

It is a Hermetic practice to seek to understand the hidden messages and meanings in synchronous events. These meaningful coincidences serve as a form of metaphorical perception. It means seeking the hidden archetypal patterns in the apparent chaos of daily life.

According to L.A. Marzulli, author of Politics, Prophecy and the Supernatural: The Coming Great Deception and The Luciferian Endgame, all of what you are seeing is part of a ritualistic process. It is something that the “engineers of society” revel in. It is human alchemy.

The rituals are being done as a form of Hermetic sympathetic magic. Marzulli claims:

“…The supernatural is something which most people either choose to believe or not to believe. There seems to be little proof for the skeptic and a plethora of evidence for the believer. In this particular case there seems to be a lot of weird coincidental parallels that jar the mind into understanding that the trickster likes to play with our minds.”

Even Aleister Crowley the great mystic knew of the elite Synarchy, composing a body of what he called “Secret Chiefs.” Crowley states in his book Magick Without Tears that:

They (the Synarchy) can induce a girl to embroider a tapestry, or initiate a political movement to culminate a world war, all in the pursuit of some plan wholly beyond the purview or the comprehension of the deepest subtlest thinkers. But, are they men in the usual sense of the word? They may be incarnate or discarnate — it is a matter of their convenience.

We understand that these Secret Chiefs were also part of the Nazi occult daisy chain.

Secret societies like the Thule Society and the Vril Society, from which the Nazi Party evolved, held beliefs predicated upon their own contact with the Secret chiefs through channeling and ritual.

SS doctors like Josef Mengele were trying to find the secrets of the Ubermench and the Aryan roots of mankind. Hitler ordered these doctors to do these experiments at the behest of the Secret Chiefs or cosmic advisers, whose mission was to give instructions on how to prepare the world for the new “Golden Dawn.”

The Nazis’ chiefs saw the human population as locusts to be exterminated in order to maintain global sustainability. It has been recorded that Hitler would often go into rages in clandestine meetings with these Secret Chiefs, claiming that he ordered his henchmen to carry out experiments and torture as many people as possible before the “Golden Dawn” was to begin.

Just last year the former Minister of Defense in Canada had told the UFO Congress, Russia Today and the Huffington Post that the United States had been guided by at least two Nordic-looking beings called “the tall whites” — characters that match the description of Aleister Crowley’s Secret Chiefs.

Earlier this year after attending the red carpet festivities of her new film Lost in the Woods actress Meryl Streep was asked by a reporter about the Charlie Hebdo shootings that had just happened. Her reply was quite cryptic:

There is always bad news that confronts us and reminds us about the giants in the sky — terrible, terrible, stuff happens.

Giants in the sky?

Was she referring to the Secret Chiefs, the hidden hand that always seems to be behind the various tragedies and life-changing events in the news?

Are these tragedies and or interventions a result of the Secret Chiefs tinkering with our lives, playing an active role in decisions that are made by our world leaders?

During a 2011 meeting of the Bilderberg Group, the strange appearance of a woman in white startled some of the attendees, who did not know who she was. According to journalist Charlie Skelton, writing in the UK’s Guardian newspaper:

From nowhere, like something from a dream, a distinguished lady, dressed from top to toe in white, whooshed serenely past security and swanned to the front of the power walkers.

No one recognized her or has seen her since. She had an ‘other-worldy quality;’ I half expected her to be leading them to Charon’s boat, or up a stairway formed of clouds.

The lady in white led her band of Bilderberg bigwigs and billionaires along the charming Swiss byways, across bridges over gentle streams… and straight into a pack of 50 baffled activists, who were milling around outside a community hall during a break in the symposium.

Today as occult observers, we can see that an establishment of a blood and soil cult exists within the European Union. The same attitudes that existed with the Martinist cult exist today in the establishment of what was originally envisioned by Synarchists as “the United States of Europe,” which was discussed openly in the Priory of Sion’s own published newsletters.

The current focus on France in the news, and the recently-demonstrated fragility of its government is perhaps no accident. Just as Europeans were originally encouraged to unite to form a bulwark against the spread of Communism, attacks from militant Islamists are now reminding Europeans of their common values of free speech, secularism, and liberty of conscience – all of which came, like the French Revolution itself, out of Masonic lodges promoting Enlightenment philosophy. Perhaps their fear of losing these freedoms will further strengthen their economic and political bonds – or as some see them, shackles.

I wonder what the Synarchists will push us into next.